Broken Music
Journal Sign up

The role of noise in experimental composition

For decades the term "noise" carried an almost exclusively negative charge, signalling interference, distortion, or simply an absence of signal. Within experimental composition that same word has been reclaimed and reshaped, treated as raw material rather than waste. Composers working across the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have built entire vocabularies out of hums, scrapes, feedback loops, magnetic hiss, and the small unintentional sounds that escape from every instrument. The result is a body of work that asks listeners to reconsider what counts as music and what kinds of listening the art form might still deserve.

This piece traces the way noise has moved from a peripheral curiosity to a structural element, and surveys the techniques, materials, and communities that sustain the practice today. Particular attention goes to the Australian context, where a small but vigorous scene has produced labels, venues, and festivals devoted to adventurous sound. Along the way readers will find a comparison of major approaches, a list of approaches worth investigating further, and reflections on how the format of the record itself shapes what listeners can hear.

Early futures and concrete sounds

The earliest systematic use of noise in composition is usually traced to Luigi Russolo and his 1913 manifesto "L'arte dei rumori". Russolo proposed a new orchestra of mechanical instruments, the intonarumori, designed to mimic and amplify industrial sounds: the hiss of steam, the grind of gears, the percussive clatter of a press. His letters from Milan, where he performed with a small ensemble, suggest an audience less prepared for sonic violence than dazzled by mechanical rhythm. Within a decade the Italian Futurists had introduced noise into operatic scoring, an inheritance that would take decades to digest.

By the late 1940s Pierre Schaeffer and Pierre Henry had developed musique concrète, a studio-based method that treated recorded sound as compositional material. Turntables, tape heads, and the splicing block became the new instruments. A dripping tap, a train whistle, or the inside of a piano could be cut, looped, reversed, and layered without ever passing through a conventional notated score. The studio itself acquired the status of a compositional instrument, and with that shift the question of noise changed forever: the material no longer needed to be born musical, because any sound captured by a microphone could be transformed into one.

Techniques side by side

Different schools of noise composition have developed distinct working methods, aesthetic priorities, and listening expectations. A useful comparison begins with technique, since method shapes what listeners eventually hear, and the historical sweep of these approaches reveals how each generation inherited and reworked the last.

Approach Working method Aesthetic emphasis Notable practitioners
Futurist noise Massed mechanical instruments, orchestral scoring Industrial power, modernity Luigi Russolo, Franco Casavola
Musique concrète Tape manipulation, splicing, looping of recorded material Concrete reality, sonic transformation Pierre Schaeffer, Pierre Henry
Fluxus events Indeterminacy, scores for any object, performance instruction Anti-art gesture, humour John Cage, La Monte Young
Industrial music Circuit-bent electronics, tape loops, found metal Post-industrial dystopia Throbbing Gristle, Cabaret Voltaire
Harsh noise wall Sustained saturated static, locked oscillations Immersive density, denial of melody The Haters, Merzbow, Incapacitants
Field recording composition Site-captured environmental sound, layered editing Place-based listening, ecology Hildegard Westerkamp, Chris Watson

Each of these methods implies a different relationship between composer, material, and listener. The Futurists staged noise as spectacle; the musique concrète practitioners internalised it as studio craft; Fluxus treated it as conceptual provocation. Industrial music and harsh noise wall pursue immersive extremes, while field recording composition turns outward, recovering ambient soundscapes that listeners rarely attend to directly.

Australian voices in the noise field

Australia's experimental music community is small in population terms but extraordinarily prolific, anchored by a handful of regional scenes that interact more than might be expected. In Brisbane, Lawrence English runs the long-running imprint Room40, releasing field recordings, drone works, and quiet electronics from a city better known for sunshine than for sustained listening. The label has documented environmental sound from the wet tropics, the inland salt lakes, and the country's vast pastoral periphery, treating landscape as recoverable narrative. English's curatorial program extends to festivals and live events that bring international practitioners into regional venues.

Melbourne supports a dense cluster of practitioners, including the percussionist and improviser Nat Grant, the laptop composer Thembi Soddell, and a generation of musicians clustered around the Make It Up Club, a Tuesday-night improv series that has run for decades at the city's inner north. Perth, on the other hand, has produced the composer and vocalist Cat Hope, whose drone-based works for low instruments and massed voices treat the entire orchestra as a sustained texture. Hobart's biennial Dark Mofo festival regularly commissions sound installations along the city's derelict industrial waterfront, framing winter as a sonic as well as visual medium. Sydney's NOW now festival has similarly maintained attention to improvised and noise-based performance, drawing local and international practitioners into intimate venues across the inner west. Across the country, the touring festival Liquid Architecture links these scenes together with curatorial attention to site-specific listening and the politics of public space, regularly staging events at the Substation in Newport, in disused warehouses, and on the unceded lands of various First Nations groups.

A particularly Australian inflection of noise practice comes from a sustained engagement with environmental sound and the vastness of the inland. Composers here have worked with recordings of cicadas in the red centre, wind on the Bunda Cliffs, and the soft roll of waves along the western coast. The continent's relative silence, outside the cities, has shaped an aesthetic preference for spaciousness and long-form attention, even within aggressive noise traditions. The compact disc and vinyl formats that sustain these releases also shape what listeners can hold in their hands, with cover art and packaging becoming part of the listening contract.

Material culture and listening practices

The question of format matters more than ever in experimental noise, where the physical artefact often carries curatorial information that streaming services strip out. A record by Merzbow, for example, typically arrives with sleeve notes describing the source material, the playback setup, and the intended listening volume. The object encourages a particular kind of attention: a deliberate setting of time and space, rather than the distracted scrolling common to a streamed service. For Australian listeners, this maps well onto a strong local culture of audiophile listening, anchored by stores such as the long-running Heartland Records in Melbourne and Missing Link in Brunswick, both of which stock a deep experimental catalogue and host listening sessions.

Independent local labels such as Room40, Unheard Editions, and End of the Alphabet emphasise short-run vinyl editions, hand-stamped sleeves, and accompanying booklets. The cassette, in turn, has experienced a particular resurgence in the country's experimental scenes, with labels such as Fait Accompli and Crammed producing runs that circulate between Adelaide, Sydney, and Brisbane through mail swaps and small venues. The cassette format's looser technical constraints invite harsher noise and longer works, while vinyl encourages a curatorial slowness that suits drone and field recording work.

Listening itself has become a compositional consideration. Several well-known pieces have come with scores instructing listeners to place speakers at the corners of a room and to walk between them, so the composition unfolds across the listener's own movement. Similar scores appear in works by Australian composers, including pieces commissioned by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's radio program The Listening Room, which in the 1990s broadcast spatial audio works to domestic listeners through carefully positioned stereo pairs.

Digital textures and networked listening

If twentieth-century noise composition was shaped by tape, oscillator, and room, twenty-first-century practice has been shaped by digital tools and network infrastructure. Software synthesisers, granular processing, and convolution reverberation have made a vast sound palette available to composers working alone at modest cost. Distribution has fragmented at the same time: Bandcamp has allowed small Australian labels to reach international listeners directly, while streaming platforms tend to flatten experimental releases into background ambience.

For composers drawn to the more deliberate forms of noise, this split has produced a hybrid practice. Digital tools are employed for experimental detail, then committed to physical format. The Australian label Hologram, for example, releases digital albums and limited-edition cassettes, the latter often bundled with digital download codes for listeners to compare formats. Sound artists working at the intersection of noise and computation often describe their practice in terms of working at the edge of audibility, where digital artefacts such as quantisation noise and aliasing become welcome guests rather than bugs.

Chance operations have similarly returned to the foreground. Earlier twentieth-century innovations of indeterminate scoring, attributed to a composer such as John Cage, have been refreshed by contemporary practitioners who use generative algorithms to produce wild compositional elements. Such methods treat the act of composition itself as an experimental situation in which the outcome cannot be predicted in advance. The wildness lies in the relinquishing of authorial control.

Approaches worth investigating

For readers drawn to the territory this article has mapped, the following entry points offer a useful path into the practice. Each represents a particular way noise has been conceived and listened to, working past the surface of the unfamiliar into the substance of the work.

The most practical thing a curious listener can do is to set aside a single hour with a single record and a single playback chain, treating the time as deliberately held. A dripping tap, the hum of an amplifier, the rustle of a sleeve: each becomes part of the listening rather than an interruption. The rewards tend to be small at first: a new texture, an unfamiliar resonance, the recognition of a sound one had previously filtered out. Over time the listening capacity itself grows, and the boundary between music and the rest of audible life begins to thin. The practice is best learned by sitting through a single record end to end, in the format it was released in, at the volume the artist suggests.